Skip to main content

Table 1 A table showing the methodological score, numbers, duration of treatment, outcomes measures and standardised mean difference for pain and function

From: Pulsed electromagnetic energy treatment offers no clinical benefit in reducing the pain of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Author

Quality Score[10] (0–5)

Number receiving PEMF

Number receiving placebo

Duration of Treatment (weeks)

Pain Outcome

Functional Outcome

Standardised Mean Difference for pain (95%CI)

Standardised Mean Difference for function (95%CI)

Klaber-Moffett et al 1996[16]

5

26

22

3

VAS Pain Scale

None reported

-0.03 (-0.59 to 0.54)

None reported

Pipetone et al 2001[14]

5

34

35

6

WOMAC Pain Scale

WOMAC Physical Function Scale

-0.10 (-0.58 to 0.37)

-0.33 (-0.80 to 0.15)

Thamsborg et al 2005[15]

3

42

41

6

WOMAC Pain scale

WOMAC Physical Function Scale

-0.31 (-0.74 to 0.12)

-0.58 (-1.02 to -0.14)

Laufer et al 2005[17]

3

27

31

3

WOMAC Pain scale

WOMAC Physical Function Scale

-0.05 (-0.57 to 0.46)

-0.09 (-0.60 to 0.43)

Callaghan et al 2005[18]

4

9

9

2

VAS Pain Scale

AIMS

-0.33 (-1.26 to 0.61)

0.00 (-0.92 to 0.92)

TOTAL

 

138

138

   

-0.16 (-0.39 to 0.08)

-0.33 (-0.59 to -0.07)

  1. VAS – Visual analogue scale,
  2. WOMAC – Western Ontario and McMaster's Universities OA index
  3. AIMS – Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale