Skip to main content

Table 4 Reliability

From: The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick DASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH

Scale

Test-retest reliability

Cross-sectional reliability

Agreement with DASH

  
 

Baseline

 

Baseline

 

Follow-up

 

Baseline

 

Follow-up

 
 

Agreement

Difference*

    

Agreement

Difference

Agreement

Difference

 

ICC (95% CI)

mean (95% CI)

alpha

ITC range

alpha

ITC range

ICC (95% CI)

mean (95% CI)

ICC (95% CI)

mean (95% CI)

DASH

0.93 (0.86–0.97)

0.9 (- 2.3–4.0)a

0.97

0.41–0.86

0.98

0.57–0.90

1

0

1

0

Quick DASH

0.93 (0.87–0.97)

-0.2(-3.6–3.1)b

0.92

0.42–0.83

0.95

0.63–0.88

0.96 (0.84–0.98)

4.2 (3.2–5.3)

0.97 (0.92–0.99)

2.6 (1.7–3.4)

Random-11 1

0.92 (0.84–0.96)

-2.1(-5.7–1.5)c

0.93

0.55–0.82

0.95

0.55–0.88

0.96 (0.92–0.98)

3.1 (2.0–4.2)

0.97 (0.91–0.98)

3.4 (2.4–4.5)

Random-11 2

0.93 (0.85–0.96)

-0.3(-3.7–3.1)b

0.91

0.42–0.81

0.95

0.62–0.87

0.97 (0.96–0.98)

1.7 (0.7–2.7)

0.99 (0.98–0.99)

0.7 (0–1.4)

  1. *calculated as the score at time 1 minus the score at time 2.
  2. All ICC values were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
  3. All differences between the DASH and the other 3 forms were significant (p ≤ 0.001) except for random-11 form 2 at follow-up (p = 0.053)
  4. ap = 0.6, bp = 0.9, cp = 0.2.
  5. ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; alpha, Cronbach alpha coefficient; ITC, item-total correlation