Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: All-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears: A protocol for a randomized trial [NCT00128076]

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Aug 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Joy MacDermid
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Joy MacDermid
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Joy MacDermid
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Joy MacDermid
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Mar 2006 Editorially accepted
10 Mar 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-7-25

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement