Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 May 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keith Rome
10 Aug 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dieter Rosenbaum
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nick Guldemond
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keith Rome
27 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dieter Rosenbaum
31 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nick Guldemond
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Nov 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nick Guldemond
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Nov 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 Dec 2005 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-6-61

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement