Skip to main content

Table 4 Agreement analysis of the annual change in knee cartilage volume measured with different samples of 1.5 mm thick MRI slices*

From: Optimal sampling of MRI slices for the assessment of knee cartilage volume for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies

 

Whole sample (n = 50)

ROA present (n = 9)

ROA absent (n = 41)

 

Difference (SD)

ICC†

Difference (SD)

ICC†

Difference (SD)

ICC†

Lateral tibial cartilage

      

The whole sample

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

1/2 whole sample‡

0.06(0.9)

0.99

0.23(1.1)

0.99

0.02(0.9)

0.98

1/3 whole sample‡

0.05(1.5)

0.96

-0.65(1.4)

0.98

0.20(1.5)

0.95

1/4 whole sample‡

-0.03(2.2)

0.92

-0.04(2.4)

0.95

-0.02(2.2)

0.91

Medial tibial cartilage

      

The whole sample

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

1/2 whole sample‡

-0.05(1.1)

0.98

-0.29(1.0)

0.99

0.00(1.1)

0.98

1/3 whole sample‡

-0.03(1.8)

0.95

0.24(1.8)

0.97

-0.10(1.8)

0.95

1/4 whole sample‡

0.02(3.0)

0.85

-1.04(2.7)

0.92

0.25(3.1)

0.83

Patellar cartilage       

      

The whole sample

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

1/2 whole sample‡

0.10(0.8)

0.99

-0.07(0.7)

1.00

0.13(0.8)

0.99

1/3 whole sample‡

0.10(1.5)

0.96

-0.18(1.4)

0.98

0.16(1.5)

0.95

1/4 whole sample‡

0.14(1.8)

0.93

0.61(1.5)

0.97

0.03(1.9)

0.92

  1. * Difference in the annual change in cartilage volume was expressed in percentage. SD: standard deviation. ROA: radiographic osteoarthritis. ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient. † All P < 0.001. ‡ Derived by extracting one in two, one in three, or one in four 1.5 mm thick MRI slices.