Open Peer Review Reports for: Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Dec 2002 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 10 Jan 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Muldrew |
| 24 Jan 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippe GAIN |
| 22 Feb 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadr Jomha |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Feb 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Feb 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Muldrew |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Mar 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Mar 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-4-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
