Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Determinants of the clinical course of musculoskeletal complaints in general practice: design of a cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Oct 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Nov 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi
17 Dec 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vincent Hildebrandt
22 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Johanna van der Waal
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi
10 Feb 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vincent Hildebrandt
17 Feb 2003 Author responded Author comments - Johanna van der Waal
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Feb 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Feb 2003 Author responded Author comments - Johanna van der Waal
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Feb 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Feb 2003 Editorially accepted
24 Feb 2003 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-4-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement