Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the hierarchy of evidence and quality appraisal stages

From: The postural effects of load carriage on young people – a systematic review

Paper

Hierarchy level

Appropriate design

Specification of subject group

Justification of sample size

Reliable and valid measurements

Sensitive outcome tool

Attention to potential biases

Real life implications

Appraisal score

Quality category

a

2a

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

10/16

Moderate

b

1b

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

15/16

High

c

1b

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

8/16

Moderate

d

1b

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

9/16

Moderate

e

1b

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

8/16

Moderate

f

2a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

9/16

Moderate

g

2a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

9/16

Moderate

  1. a refers to Chansirinukor et al (2001); b refers to Grimmer et al (2002); c refers to Hong and Brueggemann (2000); d refers to Hong and Cheung (2003); e refers to Kennedy et al (1999); f refers to Pascoe et al (1997); g refers to Wong and Hong (1997).