Systematic assessment of the quality of osteoporosis guidelines
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 May 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jun 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Ioannidis|
|15 Jul 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francoise Cluzeau|
|26 Jul 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ann Cranney|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jul 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Aug 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francoise Cluzeau|
|9 Aug 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ann Cranney|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|9 Aug 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Aug 2002||Editorially accepted|
|12 Aug 2002||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-3-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.