Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Changes in prevalence of calcaneal spurs in men & women: a random population from a trauma clinic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jill Halstead
5 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Ball
6 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Bowen
20 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Hechmi Toumi
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Hechmi Toumi
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jill Halstead
7 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Ball
19 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Bowen
30 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Hechmi Toumi
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Hechmi Toumi
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Mar 2014 Editorially accepted
15 Mar 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-87

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement