Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of included articles

From: The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Study

Randomization appropriatea

Treatment allocation concealmentb

Groups similar at baselinec

Blinding of all participantsd

Unexpected imbalance in drop-outse

Measured outcomes not reportedf

ITT analysis, missing datag

Quality scoreh

Abou-Raya et al. 2012 [49]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Afilalo et al. 2010 [50]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Baerwald et al. 2010 [51]

Not clear

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

5

Bensen et al. 1999 [52]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Bingham et al. 2007 [53]

Not clear

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

5

Boswell et al. 2008 [54]

Not clear

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

5

Burch et al. 2007 [55]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Not clear

6

Chappell et al. 2011 [26]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Chappell et al. 2009 [27]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Clegg et al. 2006 [56]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

DeLemos et al. 2011 [57]

Not clear

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Essex et al. 2012 [58]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Fishman et al. 2007 [59]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes, explained

No

Yes

6

Fleischmann et al. 2006 [60]

Not clear

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Fleischmann et al. 2001 [61]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Gana et al. 2006 [36]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Hochberg et al. 2011 [62]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Kivitz et al. 2002 [63]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Kivitz et al. 2001 [64]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Lehmann et al. 2005 [65]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Leung et al. 2002 [66]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Not clear

5

Markenson et al. 2005 [67]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Puopolo et al. 2007 [68]

Yes

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Not clear

5

Rauck et al. 2013 [69]

not clear

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Schnitzer et al. 2011 [70]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Schnitzer et al. 2011 [71]

Not clear

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

5

Schnitzer et al. 2010 [72]

Yes

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Sheldon et al. 2005 [73]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Sowers et al. 2005 [74]

Yes

Not clear

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Tannenbaum et al. 2004 [75]

Not clear

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Vojtassak et al. 2011 [76]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

7

Wiesenhutter et al. 2005 [77]

Not clear

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

  1. a“Was randomisation carried out appropriately?”.
  2. b“Was the concealment of treatment allocation adequate?”.
  3. c“Were the groups similar at the outset of the study in terms of prognostic factors, for example, severity of disease?”.
  4. d“Were the care providers, participants and outcome assessors blind to treatment allocation? If any of these people were not blinded, what might be the likely impact on the risk of bias (for each outcome)?”.
  5. e“Were there any unexpected imbalances in drop-outs between groups? If so, were they explained or adjusted for?”.
  6. f“Is there any evidence to suggest that the authors measured more outcomes than they reported?”.
  7. g“Did the analysis include an intention-to-treat analysis? If so, was this appropriate and were appropriate methods used to account for missing data?”.
  8. hQuality Score is calculated by summing the positive answers to each question (“yes” answers to questions 1–4 and 7, and “no” answers to questions 5 &6).