Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two-stage open versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 May 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
21 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 2
21 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panagiotis Korovessis
7 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - laura scaramuzzo
15 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nitin Garg
27 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
18 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-443

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement