Skip to main content

Table 1 Associations between performances on the SEBT and global strategy variables derived from CoMgl in a single model*

From: Alteration in global motor strategy following lateral ankle sprain

Group

Reaching direction

Lower limb

Global strategy variables (global CoM in vertical plane)

Model adjusted R2

p value

β

Partial correlationa

Healthy group

AM

Dominant

Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s) b

0.68

0.012

0.71

-

Non dominant

Displacement (cm) c

0.46

0.044

0.60

-

M

Dominant

Displacement (cm)

0.81

0.004

0.80

-

Non dominant

0.63

0.039

0.54

-

PM

Dominant

Displacement (cm)

0.77

0.003

0.71

0.86

Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s)

0.014

0.52

0.78

Non dominant

Displacement (cm)

0.81

0.002

0.94

-

LAS group

AM

Uninjured

Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s)

0.68

0.019

0.66

-

Injured

Displacement (cm)

0.85

0.049

0.45

0.67

Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s)

0.023

0.55

0.74

M

Uninjured

Displacement (cm)

0.78

0.022

0.59

-

Injured

0.45

0.023

0.72

-

PM

Uninjured

Displacement (cm)

0.74

0.007

0.71

-

  

Injured

 

0.54

0.009

0.81

-

  1. *Only significant combination of variables are shown.
  2. aCalculated when two strategy variables were retained.
  3. bGlobal CoM vertical velocity (Peak-to-peak value).
  4. cGlobal CoM lowering (Maximum value).