Short-term functional versus patient-reported outcome of the bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: prospective consecutive case series
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Jun 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jakob Klit|
|6 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - YAKUP EKINCI|
|13 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlos Lavernia|
|24 Oct 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Christen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Oct 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Nov 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jakob Klit|
|23 Nov 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - YAKUP EKINCI|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Dec 2014||Editorially accepted|
|16 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-15-435|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.