Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Short-term functional versus patient-reported outcome of the bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: prospective consecutive case series

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jun 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jakob Klit
6 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - YAKUP EKINCI
13 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Lavernia
24 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Matthias Christen
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jakob Klit
23 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - YAKUP EKINCI
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
16 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-435

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement