Skip to main content

Table 1 Spinal range of motion of the 3 fixation systems

From: Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system

ROM (°)

Status

Expandable device

(n = 6)

Z-plate (n = 6)

Kaneda (n = 6)

p

Flexion

Normal

9.64 (0.81)

9.98 (1.34)

9.49 (0.94)

0.717

Injury

17.73 (3.67)a

19.02 (3.12)a

19.18 (3.21)a

0.718

Internal fixation

5.72 (0.44)ab

5.70 (0.50)ab

5.63 (0.65)ab

0.957

Extension

Normal

8.45 (0.52)

8.45 (0.43)

8.48 (0.44)

0.994

Injury

13.51 (2.21)a

13.50 (2.53)a

13.43 (2.25)a

0.998

Internal fixation

5.25 (0.28)ab

5.14 (0.31)ab

5.12 (0.19)ab

0.671

Left bending

Normal

8.71 (0.30)

8.78 (0.27)

8.55 (0.41)

0.484

Injury

18.07 (3.66)a

18.23 (3.81)a

18.87 (4.22)a

0.932

Internal fixation

5.50 (0.21)ab

5.37 (0.21)ab

5.04 (0.13)*†ab

0.002

Right bending

Normal

8.35 (0.37)

8.47 (0.42)

8.43 (0.39)

0.869

Injury

18.45 (3.72)a

18.69 (3.80)a

19.05 (2.54)a

0.955

Internal fixation

5.01 (0.12)ab

5.05 (0.14)ab

5.04 (0.11)ab

0.887

Left axial rotation

Normal

7.11 (0.40)

6.97 (0.34)

7.07 (0.28)

0.769

Injury

19.56 (2.98)a

19.05 (3.22)a

19.04 (3.26)a

0.948

Internal fixation

4.53 (0.42)ab

5.23 (0.30)*ab

5.02 (0.15)*ab

0.005

Right axial rotation

Normal

6.95 (0.35)

6.91 (0.31)

6.84 (0.44)

0.883

Injury

19.60 (3.18)a

18.65 (3.41)a

19.41 (3.35)a

0.873

Internal fixation

4.49 (0.47)ab

5.23 (0.20)*ab

5.08 (0.17)*ab

0.002

  1. ROM, range of motion.
  2. Data are presented by mean and standard deviation.
  3. *Indicates a significant difference compared to the expandable device group.
  4. †Indicates a significant difference compared to the Z-Plate group.
  5. aIndicates a significant difference compared to the normal state within a group (all, p <0.001).
  6. bIndicates a significant difference compared to the injured state within group (all, p <0.001).