Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Screening of the spine in adolescents: inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Kamper
10 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mitchell Haas
22 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ellen Aartun
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ellen Aartun
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Kamper
6 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mitchell Haas
14 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ellen Aartun
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ellen Aartun
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mitchell Haas
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
5 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement