Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between patients with positive clavicle angle and T1 Tilt angle and those without

From: Postoperative shoulder imbalance in Lenke Type 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and related factors

  Clavicle angle at 2 years T1 tilt angle at 2 years
  > 0 ≤ 0 p-value > 0 ≤ 0 p-value
Preop. Cobb angle of MT (°) 53.9 ± 8.6 56.7 ± 11.6 0.19 55.4 ± 9.7 52.8 ± 9.0 0.20
Flexibility of MT (%) 48.9 ± 16.7 44.6 ± 19.3 0.27 48.41 ± 7.7 46.4 ± 17.0 0.59
Correction rate of MT (%) 75.1 ± 12.0 68.4 ± 14.5 0.02* 74.5 ± 12.7 71.1 ± 13.5 0.22
Apical translation of MT (mm) 50.7 ± 17.3 62.1 ± 27.4 0.01* 52.7 ± 18.7 55.8 ± 24.9 0.48
Correction rate of apical translation of MT (%) 50.7 ± 17.0 62.1 ± 27.4 0.005* 70.7 ± 19.5 67.0 ± 21.0 0.39
Preop. Cobb angle of PT (°) 26.7 ± 8.1 26.4 ± 7.5 0.86 28.8 ± 6.7 21.7 ± 8.2 0.001*
Flexibility of PT (%) 34.4 ± 30.4 34.7 ± 21.5 0.97 29.3 ± 28.0 46.2 ± 25.9 0.005*
Correction rate of PT (%) 41.9 ± 23.8 51.2 ± 17.4 0.07 39.6 ± 17.8 55.0 ± 28.5 0.001*
Preop. Cobb angle of LC (°) 28.7 ± 5.3 30.2 ± 6.9 0.25 29.1 ± 5.8 29.1 ± 5.7 0.97
Flexibility of LC (%) 92.5 ± 30.8 95.5 ± 33.3 0.67 96.7 ± 33.2 85.5 ± 251 0.09
Correction rate of LC (%) 80.4 ± 4.2 75.5 ± 15.4 0.16 80.4 ± 13.5 76.5 ± 16.6 0.20
Preop. clavicle angle (°) −2.3 ± 2.4 −4.5 ± 3.2 0.001* −2.6 ± 2.7 −3.4 ± 3.0 0.20
Preop. T1 tilt angle (°) −1.6 ± 5.9 −5.3 ± 8.8 0.017* −1.0 ± 6.6 −6.3 ± 6.4 0.001*
  1. MT; main thoracic curve, PT; proximal thoracic curve, LC; lumbar curve.
  2. Asterisks indicate statistical significance.