Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between patients with positive clavicle angle and T1 Tilt angle and those without

From: Postoperative shoulder imbalance in Lenke Type 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and related factors

 

Clavicle angle at 2 years

T1 tilt angle at 2 years

 

> 0

≤ 0

p-value

> 0

≤ 0

p-value

Preop. Cobb angle of MT (°)

53.9 ± 8.6

56.7 ± 11.6

0.19

55.4 ± 9.7

52.8 ± 9.0

0.20

Flexibility of MT (%)

48.9 ± 16.7

44.6 ± 19.3

0.27

48.41 ± 7.7

46.4 ± 17.0

0.59

Correction rate of MT (%)

75.1 ± 12.0

68.4 ± 14.5

0.02*

74.5 ± 12.7

71.1 ± 13.5

0.22

Apical translation of MT (mm)

50.7 ± 17.3

62.1 ± 27.4

0.01*

52.7 ± 18.7

55.8 ± 24.9

0.48

Correction rate of apical translation of MT (%)

50.7 ± 17.0

62.1 ± 27.4

0.005*

70.7 ± 19.5

67.0 ± 21.0

0.39

Preop. Cobb angle of PT (°)

26.7 ± 8.1

26.4 ± 7.5

0.86

28.8 ± 6.7

21.7 ± 8.2

0.001*

Flexibility of PT (%)

34.4 ± 30.4

34.7 ± 21.5

0.97

29.3 ± 28.0

46.2 ± 25.9

0.005*

Correction rate of PT (%)

41.9 ± 23.8

51.2 ± 17.4

0.07

39.6 ± 17.8

55.0 ± 28.5

0.001*

Preop. Cobb angle of LC (°)

28.7 ± 5.3

30.2 ± 6.9

0.25

29.1 ± 5.8

29.1 ± 5.7

0.97

Flexibility of LC (%)

92.5 ± 30.8

95.5 ± 33.3

0.67

96.7 ± 33.2

85.5 ± 251

0.09

Correction rate of LC (%)

80.4 ± 4.2

75.5 ± 15.4

0.16

80.4 ± 13.5

76.5 ± 16.6

0.20

Preop. clavicle angle (°)

−2.3 ± 2.4

−4.5 ± 3.2

0.001*

−2.6 ± 2.7

−3.4 ± 3.0

0.20

Preop. T1 tilt angle (°)

−1.6 ± 5.9

−5.3 ± 8.8

0.017*

−1.0 ± 6.6

−6.3 ± 6.4

0.001*

  1. MT; main thoracic curve, PT; proximal thoracic curve, LC; lumbar curve.
  2. Asterisks indicate statistical significance.