Open Peer Review Reports for: Rheumatologists lack confidence in their knowledge of cannabinoids pertaining to the management of rheumatic complaints
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary-Ann Fitzcharles |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary-Ann Fitzcharles |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary Lynch |
| 18 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meldon Kahan |
| 30 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary-Ann Fitzcharles |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 30 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary-Ann Fitzcharles |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Jul 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Jul 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-258 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
