Skip to main content

Table 1 Subject characteristics distributed by recruitment location (non-dancer vs. dancer)

From: The functional consequences of Generalized Joint Hypermobility: a cross-sectional study

 

Non-dancer (n = 36)

Dancer (n = 36)

p-value

Classified with GJH (Beigton ≥4: % positive)*

10 (29%) positive vs. 26 (61%) negative

24 (66%) positive vs. 12 (34%) negative

p = .004

 

Mean (SD)

Range

Mean (SD)

Range

 

Age (years)**

20 (2)

17.0–24.0

20 (2)

17.0–24.0

P = .999

BMI (Kg/m 2 )

22.3 (2.5)

(18.5-28.4)

20.8 (1.8)

(16.8–23.5)

p = .002

Functional status: Performance

Total PAL (METS)

168.8 (94.4)

16.8–435.2

195.5 (104.4)

37.8–491.5

p = .234

Functional status: Capacity

6MWT (m)

575.3 (67.5)

418.5–704

630.8 (58.6)

492.0–780.0

p = <.0001

SQH (count)

98.6 (24.9)

50.0–144.0

117.2 (16.9)

67.0–150.0

p = <.0001

SH (count)

56.8 (20.1)

24.0-115.0

68.3 (21.1)

35.0–125.0

p = .015

Muscle Strength (N)

2037.0 (337.2)

(1651.7–3313.3)

1988.6 (363.2)

(1387.7–2854.0)

p = .605

Pain intensity (mm)

43.5 (20.2)

(0.0–79.0)

38.3 (20.0)

(0.0–72.0)

p = .258

Fatigue (CIS)

26 (21)

(5–97)

47 (17)

(10–83)

p = <.0001

  1. Abbreviations: Body Mass Index (BMI), Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH), Total Physical Activity level (PAL), Metabolic Equivalent Tasks (METS), Six minute walk test (6MWT), Square Hop (SQH), Side hop (SH), Newton (N), Checklist Individual Strength (CIS). *Chi-square analysis **age matched Significant associations are presented in bold.