This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis
© Golovakha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 10 February 2014
Accepted: 25 June 2014
Published: 10 July 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Feb 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Emin Aghayev|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - faik türkmen|
|19 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Elson|
|27 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Emin Aghayev|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jun 2014||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-15-230|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.