Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reproducibility of and sex differences in common orthopaedic ankle and foot tests in runners

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takashi Nagai
17 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Evans
5 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takashi Nagai
16 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Evans
22 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Maarten P. Van der Worp
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
23 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-171

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement