Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Mechanical testing of a device for subcutaneous internal anterior pelvic ring fixation versus external pelvic ring fixation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joerg Boehme
19 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fabian Stuby
20 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pol Maria Rommens
13 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Georg Osterhoff
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fabian Stuby
14 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pol Maria Rommens
25 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joerg Boehme
7 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Georg Osterhoff
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Georg Osterhoff
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Mar 2014 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-111

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement