Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toshiaki Hirose
8 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Oizumi
11 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Oizumi
27 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toshiaki Hirose
17 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kalbfleisch
3 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Cosimo Tudisco
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
10 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-43

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement