Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun O'Leary
7 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Sullivan
29 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sionnadh McLean
19 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tina Juul
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Sullivan
23 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun O'Leary
29 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sionnadh McLean
19 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tina Juul
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
3 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-339

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement