The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaun O'Leary|
|7 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Sullivan|
|29 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sionnadh McLean|
|19 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tina Juul|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Sullivan|
|23 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaun O'Leary|
|29 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sionnadh McLean|
|19 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tina Juul|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-339|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.