Skip to main content

Table 1 Total birth prevalence per type of congenital limb defects for the period 1981–2010 in the northern Netherlands

From: Birth prevalence for congenital limb defects in the northern Netherlands: a 30-year population-based study

CLD

Isolated CLD, n

Multiple congenital anomalies, n

CLD is part of a recognised condition, n

Total, n

Prevalence per 10,000

Polydactyly

291

45

83

419

8.4

  Upper limb

228

38

63a

329

6.6

    Preaxial

73

13

20

106

2.1

    Postaxial

141

21

39

201

4.0

    NOS

14

4

6

24

0.5

  Lower limb

75

9

32

116

2.3

    Preaxial

12

1

8

21

0.4

    Postaxial

59

7

19

85

1.7

    NOS

4

1

5

10

0.2

  NOS

4

0

2

6

0.1

  Upper and lower limb

16

2

14

32

0.6

Reduction defects

180

42

120

342

6.9

  Upper limb

128

28

94

250

5.0

    Transverse

89

17

39

145

2.9

    Longitudinal

21b

9

51

81

1.6

      Preaxial

12

7

33

52

1.0

      Postaxial

10

2

18

30

0.6

    Intercalary

3

1

5

9

0.2

    Central

16

1

4

21

0.4

    Multiple

1

0

5

6

0.1

  Lower limb

66

25

58

149

3.0

    Transverse

29

15

31

75

1.5

    Longitudinal

23c

5

24

52

1.0

      Preaxial

4

3

9

16

0.3

      Postaxial

21

2

16

39

0.8

    Intercalary

7

5

10

22

0.4

    Central

13

1

2

16

0.3

    Multiple

7

2

8d

17

0.3

    NOS

1

1

0

2

0.04

  NOS

0

0

1

1

0.02

  Upper and lower limb

14

11

33

58

1.2

Syndactyly

126

29

77

232

4.7

  Upper limb

77

17

46

140

2.8

  Lower limb

59

12

46

117

2.4

  NOS

0

1

0

1

0.02

  Upper and lower limb

10

1

15

26

0.5

Other CLDe

41

34

88

163

3.3

  Upper limb

18

14

66

98

2.0

  Lower limb

25

22

53

100

2.0

  NOS

0

1

0

1

0.02

  Upper and lower limb

2

3

31

36

0.7

Multiple CLDf

38g

14g

49g

101

2.0

Total no. of cases

598

135

315

1048

21.1

  Total no. of live births

587

77

159

823

16.5

  1. Total number of births for the period 1981–2010: n = 497,751.
  2. Abbreviations: CLD–congenital limb defects, NOS–not otherwise specified, n–number of children with CLD.
  3. aTwo children had preaxial and postaxial polydactyly of upper limbs.
  4. bOne child had preaxial and postaxial longitudinal reduction defects of upper limbs.
  5. cTwo children had preaxial and postaxial longitudinal reduction defects of lower limbs.
  6. dOne child had transversal, longitudinal and intercalary reduction defects of lower limbs.
  7. eThe category consisted of CLD like arthrogryposis (n = 40), hemihypertrophy (n = 25), contractures of elbows/knees/fingers (n = 19), undergrowth of limbs (n = 9), radio-ulnar synostosis (n = 5), macrodactyly (n = 4).
  8. fCategory containing cases with several CLD included in the study.
  9. gChildren in the group with isolated (n = 2), multiple congenital anomalies (n = 1), and CLD as part of a recognised condition (n = 4) had three types of CLD, whereas the rest of the children with multiple limb defects had two types of CLD.