Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Use of resources and costs associated with the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture at an orthopedics and traumatology surgery department in Denia (Spain): collagenase clostridium hystolyticum versus subtotal fasciectomy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Sanjuan Cervero
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mustafa Younis
8 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annet Van Rijssen
11 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neal Chen
18 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Sanjuan Cervero
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neal Chen
3 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annet Van Rijssen
22 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Sanjuan Cervero
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neal Chen
25 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annet Van Rijssen
23 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Sanjuan Cervero
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
14 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-293

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement