Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Enhancing the quality of international orthopedic medical mission trips using the blue distinction criteria for knee and hip replacement centers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Megan Bohensky
11 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Flavia Cicuttini
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Kyle Dempsey
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Kyle Dempsey
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Flavia Cicuttini
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
23 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-275

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement