Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Erratum to: prognostic implications of the Quebec Task Force classification of back-related leg pain: an analysis of longitudinal routine clinical data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Aug 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Catia Cornacchia
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-236

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.