Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic implications of the Quebec Task Force classification of back-related leg pain: an analysis of longitudinal routine clinical data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Burdorf
8 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill
1 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Alice Kongsted
Resubmission - Version 2
1 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Burdorf
15 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Alice Kongsted
Resubmission - Version 3
15 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Alice Kongsted
Resubmission - Version 4
15 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 May 2013 Editorially accepted
24 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-171

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement