Accuracy and reproducibility of a retrospective outcome assessment for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naffis Anjarwalla|
|14 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeremy Fairbank|
|14 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Pekka Kuittinen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeremy Fairbank|
|4 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naffis Anjarwalla|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-83|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.