Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Martijn Poeze
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eamonn Delahunt
1 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Eils
24 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Phillip Gribble
5 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martijn Poeze
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eamonn Delahunt
29 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martijn Poeze
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Phillip Gribble
30 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Eils
19 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martijn Poeze
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 May 2012 Editorially accepted
28 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-81

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement