The role of surgeon volume on patient outcome in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter van der Weegen|
|11 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bregje Thomassen|
|30 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Rick Lau|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bregje Thomassen|
|4 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter van der Weegen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-250|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.