Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic factors for non-success in patients with sciatica and disc herniation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alice Kongsted
22 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Skillgate
23 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet
19 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anne Julsrud Haugen
Resubmission - Version 2
19 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alice Kongsted
22 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet
24 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Skillgate
23 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anne Julsrud Haugen
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
19 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-183

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement