Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Risk factors and clinical presentation of craniocervical arterial dissection: A prospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Maher
4 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Haneline
22 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lucy Thomas
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Haneline
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-164

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.