Skip to main content

Table 5 Methodological quality of satisfaction studies or cohort studies with a satisfaction component for services provided by physiotherapists in advanced practice physiotherapy roles

From: Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review

Study

Kennedy et al. 2010

Taylor et al. 2010

Daker-White et al. 1999

Sephton et al. 2010

Campos-Ayling et al. 2002

McClellan et al. 2006

Richardson et al. 2005

Item Evaluation Criteria (maximum = 1; mimimum = 0)*‡

       

1. Relevant background cited to establish a foundation for research question

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

2. Adequate description of the study setting and patients characteristics

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

3. Inception cohort sampled

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4. Data collection process administered by independent evaluators

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

5. Respondents informed that their results are anonymous or not shared with treatment providers

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

6. Standardized satisfaction tool/measure used with known validity and reliability; Item

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

7. Timing of data collection sufficiently close to care treatment/encounter as to minimise recall bias;

0

1

0

1

0

1

1

8. Accounted for missing data;

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

9. ≥ 80% of eligible patients sampled

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

10. Clearly defined measurements of components of satisfaction:

       

a. Affability/Patients centeredness and interpersonal interactions with providers

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

b. Process (accessibility, availability, efficiency of care)

1

N/A

1

N/A

1

N/A

0

c. Perceived competency of professionals

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

d. Satisfaction with outcomes

1

1

0

N/A

1

1

N/A

11. Appropriate statistical test(s) performed;

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

12. Conclusions and clinical recommendations supported by the study objectives, analysis and results

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

Total score (%)

93%

71%

71%

69%

67%

57%

36%

Rank

1

2

2

3

4

5

6

  1. *1 indicates that criterion was fulfilled and 0 indicates that criterion was not fulfilled or not reported.
  2. N/A = not applicable to paper. Scores obtained after consensus.