Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prevalence and tracking of back pain from childhood to adolescence

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Per Kjaer
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Dunn
20 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciola Menezes-Costa
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Per Kjaer
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Dunn
23 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciola Menezes-Costa
28 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Per Kjaer
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Per Kjaer
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
12 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Per Kjaer
Resubmission - Version 11
12 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
16 May 2011 Editorially accepted
16 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-12-98

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement