Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Should we consider Dupuytren's contracture as work-related? A review and meta-analysis of an old debate

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Barr
15 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Fedorczyk
18 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Kietrys
8 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 6
4 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - alexis descatha
Resubmission - Version 8
12 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
16 May 2011 Editorially accepted
16 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-12-96

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement