Skip to main content

Table 4 Intra-rater reliability

From: Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study

 

Mean Rater Day 1

Mean Rater Day 2

Mean Difference (95% CI)

Difference p-value (2-sided)

Concordance Correlation Coefficient (95% CI)

B-A Mean Difference (95% Limits of Agreement)

Marker Method

Flexion

      

RF Day 1 v Day 2

91.5

91.9

0.5 (-0.1 to 1.1)

0.13

0.997 (0.996 to 1.0)

0.5 (-2.2 to 3.1)

PT Day 1 v Day 2

90.1

90.4

0.3 (-0.2 to 0.8)

0.24

0.998 (0.997 to 1.0)

0.3 (-2.0 to 2.6)

OS Day 1 v Day 2

90.8

89.7

-1.1 (-2.9 to 0.6)

0.19

0.981 (0.967 to 1.0)

-1.1 (-8.9 to 6.6)

Extension

RF Day 1 v Day 2

13.8

14.9

1.1 (-0.5 to 2.7)

0.14

0.980 (0.966 to 0.995)

1.1 (-2.9 to 5.1)

PT Day 1 v Day 2

12.1

13.3

1.2 (0.0 to 2.4)

0.05

0.983 (0.971 to 0.995)

1.2 (-1.8 to 4.3)

OS Day 1 v Day 2

12.8

14.1

1.3 (-1.6 to 4.2)

0.32

0.941 (0.906 to 0.977)

1.3 (-6.1 to 8.7)

Line of Femur Method

Flexion

RF Day 1 v Day 2

92.1

93.0

0.9 (0.0 to 1.7)

0.05

0.995 (0.992 to 0.999)

0.9 (-2.9 to 4.6)

PT Day 1 v Day 2

90.5

90.8

0.3 (-0.3 to 0.9)

0.29

0.998 (0.997 to 1.0)

0.3 (-2.2 to 2.8)

OS Day 1 v Day 2

92.4

92.3

-0.1 (-0.6 to 0.5)

0.73

0.998 (0.997 to 1.0)

-0.1 (-2.5 to 2.3)

Extension

RF Day 1 v Day 2

15.0

16.4

1.4 (0.2 to 2.7)

0.03

0.983 (0.971 to 0.995)

1.4 (-1.7 to 4.6)

PT Day 1 v Day 2

9.1

9.3

0.2 (-0.9 to 1.2)

0.72

0.990 (0.983 to 0.997)

0.7 (-2.5 to 2.9)

OS Day 1 v Day 2

14.0

14.4

0.4 (-1.1 to 2.0)

0.54

0.987 (0.978 to 0.996)

0.4 (-3.6 to 4.5)

  1. RF = research fellow; PT = physiotherapist; OS = orthopaedic surgeon; v = versus; B-A = Bland-Altman