Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of standard fusion with a "topping off" system in lumbar spine surgery: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter Knoell
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison H McGregor
5 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter Knoell
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison H McGregor
23 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter Knoell
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter Knoell
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
18 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-12-239

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement