Skip to main content

Table 3 Individual Study Characteristics

From: Prognostic factors in non-surgically treated sciatica: A systematic review

ID

Author

Population studied

Subjects

Sciatica definition

Treatment

Follow-up (months)

Study Quality

Predictors studied

Outcomes measured

1

Balague et al (1999)

[12]

Consecutive hospital admissions with severe acute sciatica

82

66% male

mean age 43 yrs

73 at follow-up

Unilateral leg pain +/- LBP

and

positive neurological signs

and/or

radiological evidence of spinal nerve root compression

Conservative "intensive pain management"

12

High

Age, gender, duration of symptoms, smoking, previous sciatica, EMG, BMI, QOL, disability, pain, imaging results (MRI, CT), neurological signs, antibody test

"Recovery" (composite score including pain, disability & muscle strength)

Recovery defined as:

ODI Score ≤ 20

VAS pain ≤ 15

Normal muscle strength test (score 5)

2

Beauvais et al (2003)

[13]

Consecutive patients attending rheumatology departments with symptoms of sciatica or femoral neuralgia of < 1 month duration and disc herniation on CT

75

58% male

mean age 41 yrs

60 at follow-up

Symptoms & examination consistent with sciatic or femoral neuralgia

and

CT evidence of intervertebral disk herniation

Conservative

Bed rest, analgesics, lumbar brace +/- epidural steroid injection

3

Adequate

Age, gender, distribution of pain, duration of pain, previous sciatica, presence of severe pain requiring inpatient treatment, CT findings

"Recovery"

Complete = return to usual work/activities, little or no analgesia

Partial = residual pain, frequent analgesic use, complete or partial return to work, limited athletic activities

Failure = persistent pain, continuous analgesic use, unable to return to work

3

Carragee & Kim (1997)

[14]

Consecutive patients referred to hospital for MRI scan with symptoms suggestive of sciatica and available for 2 year follow-up

188

58% male

mean age 42.5 yrs

135 at follow-up

Lower extremity radicular pain (greater than back pain)

and

Positive SLR test

or motor weakness

and

abnormal MRI scan

Usual care

Conservative 64% and surgical 36%

24

Adequate

Disc morphology on MRI, age, gender, height, weight, duration, affected side, previous spinal surgery, occupation (heaviness of work), SLR, motor weakness, co-morbidity, smoking, alcohol, workers compensation, litigation, mode of treatment.

Composite measure of overall outcome comprising sum of scores on 0-10 scale for self-reported pain, medication use, activity restriction and satisfaction, total divided by 4 to give outcome score

> 6 = good

≤6 = poor

4

Hasenbring et al (1994)

[15]

Consecutive patients admitted to hospital with acute radicular pain and radiologically diagnosed disc prolapse

111

60% male

mean age 41.7 yrs

90 at follow-up

Acute radicular

pain

and

radiologically diagnosed lumbar disc prolapse or protrusion

Usual care

Surgical 66%

Conservative 34%

6

Adequate

Depression (BDI), "daily hassles in fifteen areas of daily living including work, home, relationships and financial" (KISS)

"emotional, cognitive & coping reactions to pain" (KSI), health locus of control", duration of symptoms, nature of onset, previous surgery, disc displacement on imaging, paresis, scoliosis, treatment (surgical/conservative), obesity, age, social status, occupation (posture, heaviness of work), duration of inability to work

Pain Intensity

Self report

8 point scale

5

Jensen et al 2007

[16]

Consecutive patients referred to a specialist outpatient back pain centre with symptoms suggestive of sciatica and enrolled in an RCT of active conservative treatment

187

55.5% male

mean age 45 yrs

154 at follow-up

Radicular symptoms with a dermatomal distribution

Conservative

Education, reassurance, analgesia, +/- exercise programme +/- manual physiotherapy

If surgery required patients excluded from follow-up analysis

14

High

MRI findings (disc contour, height, signal & herniation); nerve root compromise; spinal stenosis (central, lateral, foraminal).

Age

Gender

Treatment

"Recovery" (composite score including pain on 11 point VRS & disability on RMDQ)

Recovery defined as:

Pain score < 1 & RMDQ ≤ 3

6

Komori et al 2002

[17]

Consecutive patients presenting to hospital with unilateral leg pain and with radiologically confirmed herniated disc

131

no demographic data presented

90 at follow-up

Unilateral leg pain

and

MRI evidence of herniated

nucleus pulposus

Usual care

Conservative - rest, medication, traction.

If surgery required patients excluded from follow-up analysis

12

Poor

Age, gender, occupation (heaviness of work), previous LBP or sciatica, Duration of symptoms

Leg symptoms ( pain, SLR, FST, motor paresis & sensory disturbance)

Level & type of herniation/disc degeneration on MRI scan

Outcome defined according to residual self-reported symptoms and disability on 3 point scale (poor, fair, good)

7

Miranda et al (2002)

[19]

Employees of Finnish forestry industry receiving annual questionnaire about musculoskeletal pain

3312

74% male

mean age 45.3 yrs

2984 at follow-up

Self-reported low back pain with leg pain radiating below the knee

None

12

High

Age, gender, weight, height, smoking, driving, mental stress

Occupational activities (twisting, bending, kneeling or squatting, working with arms raised, lifting), heaviness of work, 'overload' at work, risk of accident at work,

Physical exercise and sporting activity in general & specific sports

Outcome defined as persistence of pain based on self report of sciatic pain

Persistence = sciatica pain on >30 days/year in 2 consecutive years (1994 & 1995) on modified NMQ)

8

Vroomen et al (2002)

[18]

Consecutive patients presenting to GP with 1st episode of sciatica and pain sufficient to justify further therapy. Study performed concurrently with RCT of bed rest

183

56% male

mean age 46 yrs

169 at follow-up

Leg pain in dermatomal distribution

and

≥ 2 of the following:

• Increased pain on coughing & sneezing

• Sensory loss

• Muscle weakness

• Reflex loss

• Positive nerve root irritation signs

Usual care

Surgery if indicated (15%)

A second analysis excluding patients who had surgical treatment (n = 156) was performed

3

Adequate

Age, gender, education, living alone, employment, previous sciatica, previous LBP, family history, co-morbidity, smoking, sporting activity, BMI, Duration of symptoms, revised Oswestry score, Roland disability score, MPQ score

Leg pain > back pain

Pain-related symptoms and examination findings (SLR, FST, paresis, sensory loss, finger to floor distance)

Poor outcome defined as absence of any improvement at 3 months based on self-reported change in symptoms

  1. BDI Beck Depression Inventory
  2. BMI Body Mass Index
  3. CT Computed Tomography
  4. EMG Electromyogram
  5. FST Femoral Stretch test
  6. KISS Kiel Inventory of Subjective Situations
  7. KSI Kiel Pain Inventory
  8. LBP Low back pain
  9. MPQ McGill Pain Questionnaire
  10. MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  11. NMQ Nordic Questionnaire
  12. ODI Oswestry Disability Index
  13. QOL Quality of life
  14. RMDQ Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
  15. SLR Straight leg raise test
  16. VAS Visual Analogue Score
  17. VRS Verbal Rating Scale