Table 3 The effect of intervention on annual percentage change in tibial cartilage volume
Mean | Adjusted mean* | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Mean (SD) | Control Mean (SD) | Difference† Mean (95% CI) | P value† | Intervention Mean (SE) | Control Mean (SE) | Difference† Mean (95% CI) | P value† | |
From baseline to 12 month follow up | ||||||||
Medial tibial cartilage | 1.4 (5.2) | 3.3 (4.4) | 1.9 (-0.7, 4.5) | 0.15 | 1.3 (1.0) | 3.3 (0.9) | 2.0 (-0.8, 4.9) | 0.16 |
Lateral tibial cartilage | 2.8 (6.8) | 1.0 (5.9) | -1.8 (-5.3, 1.6) | 0.29 | 3.3 (1.3) | 0.6 (1.1) | -2.7 (-6.2, 0.7) | 0.12 |
From baseline to 24 month follow up | ||||||||
Medial tibial cartilage | -0.3 (2.7) | 2.3 (2.6) | 2.6 (1.2, 4.1) | 0.001 | -0.4 (0.6) | 2.4 (0.5) | 2.7 (1.2, 4.3) | 0.001 |
Lateral tibial cartilage | -1.4 (4.3) | 1.4 (2.6) | 2.8 (0.9, 4.7) | 0.005 | -1.3 (0.7) | 1.3 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.6, 4.5) | 0.01 |