Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Study protocol of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a biopsychosocial multidisciplinary intervention in the evolution of non-specific sub-acute low back pain in the working population: cluster randomised trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
11 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Resubmission - Version 8
11 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
11 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Resubmission - Version 9
11 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
22 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
22 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-12-194

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement