Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants according to pain group (no LBP and CLBP) and according to participation in the secondary study (responder and non-responder)

From: Individuals with chronic low back pain have greater difficulty in engaging in positive lifestyle behaviours than those without back pain: An assessment of health literacy

Descriptor

No LBP

CLBP

 

Responder

Non-responder

Responder

Non-responder

N (% within pain groups)

44 (72.1)

17 (27.9)

36 (64.3)

20 (35.7)

Age (years), mean (SD)

37.8 (15.2)

40.5 (7.9)

42.2 (12.3)

37.0 (16.6)

Female, N (%)

25 (56.8)

12 (70.6)

24 (66.7)

10 (50.0)

Highest level of education, N (%)

    

   Never attended school

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

   Some primary school

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

   Completed primary school

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

   Some secondary school

0 (0)

 

2 (5.6)

 

   Completed secondary school

8 (18.2)

 

7 (19.4)

 

   Trade certificate or diploma

17 (38.6)

 

16 (44.4)

 

   University degree

19 (43.2)

 

11 (30.6)

 

Age of onset of LBP (years), mean (SD)

  

26.9 (11.8)

21.4 (11.4)

Intensity of pain in last week, median (IQR) for NRS 0-10)

  

4 (3)

4 (4)

Episodes of LBP in the last year, N (%)

    

   1-3 episodes

  

2 (5.6)

0 (0)

   4-10 episodes

  

10 (27.8)

7 (35.0)

   > 10 episodes

  

24 (66.7)

13 (65.0)

Number of work days missed due to LBP, N (%)

    

   0 days

  

25 (69.4)

12 (63.2)

   1-2 days

  

2 (5.6)

4 (21.1)

   3-7 days

  

7 (19.4)

3 (15.8)

   15-30 days

  

1 (2.8)

0 (0)

   181-365 days

  

1 (2.8)

0 (0)

   no response

  

0 (0)

1 (0)

Impact of LBP, N (%) responding 'yes'

    

   Seeking health professional advice

  

16 (44.4)

10 (50.0)

   Using medication for pain

  

18 (50.0)

5 (25.0)

   LBP interfering with normal activities

  

22 (62.9)

11 (55.0)

   LBP interfering with recreational activities

  

23 (63.9)

9 (45.0)

ODI score (%), mean (SD)

  

18.3 (10.2)

15.3 (8.8)

FABQ-physical activity score [0-24], mean (SD)

  

15.1 (4.9)

13.7 (5.6)

FABQ-work score [0-42], mean (SD)

  

10.6 (9.6)

9.9 (7.8)

BBQ score [9-45], mean (SD)

26.3 (5.9)

30.4 (4.4)*

26.9 (5.6)

28.3 (6.6)

CSQ catastrophizing score [0-24], mean (SD)

5.1 (4.6)

4.4 (4.9)

6.1 (5.4)

6.3 (4.2)

S-TOFHLA numeracy score [0-28], mean (SD)^

27.8 (1.1)

27.6 (1.8)

27.0 (3.0)

27.7 (1.6)

S-TOFHLA reading comprehension score [0-72], mean (SD)^

70.4 (1.9)

70.3 (2.3)

70.8 (1.8)

71.0 (1.2)

S-TOFHLA total score [0-72], mean (SD)^

98.4 (1.9)

97.8 (2.6)

97.6 (4.1)

98.7 (2.2)

  1. NRS = numeric rating scale
  2. * significant difference between responder and non-responder (p < 0.01)
  3. ^ The s-TOFHLA score is usually reported as a categorical outcome (inadequate (0-53), marginal (54-66), adequate (67-100). Here we report the data as continuous for finer level comparison.