Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the methodological quality assessment*

From: Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature

 

Fulfilled validity criteria

Unfulfilled validity criteria

Incomplete information for validity assessment

Internal validity score

Methodological quality

Study

Selection bias (1,2,3)

Performance bias (5)

Attrition bias (6,8)

Detection bias (4,7)

    

MIS

        

Lawlor et al. [31]

1,2,3

5

6

4,7

8

-

7

High

Chimento et al. [4]

1,2,3

5

6

4,7

8

-

7

High

Ogonda et al. [34]

1,2,3

5

6

4,7

8

-

7

High

Kim [30]

1,3

5

6

4,7

2,8

-

6

High

Bennett et al. [22]

3

5

6

4,7

8

1,2

5

Medium

Chung et al. [23]

3

5

6

4,7

1,2,8

-

5

Medium

Khan et al. [29]

3

5

6

4,7

1,2,8

-

5

Medium

Dorr et al. [26]

3

5

6

4,7

8

1,2

5

Medium

Ciminiello et al. [24]

3

5

6

7

1,2,4,8

-

4

Medium

Dutka et al. [27]

3

-

6

4,7

1,2,8

5

4

Medium

Hart et al. [28]

3

-

6

4,7

8

1,2,5

4

Medium

Mazoochian et al. [37]

3

5

-

4,7

8

1,2,6

4

Medium

Rittmeister & Peters [35]

3

5

6

7

1,2,4,8

-

4

Medium

Speranza et al. [36]

3

5

6

7

4,8

1,2

4

Medium

DiGioia et al. [17]

3

5

-

4,7

1,2,8

6

4

Medium

De Beer et al. [25]

3

-

6

7

1,2,4,8

5

3

Medium

Levine et al. [32]

3

-

6

7

1,2,4,5,8

-

3

Medium

Nakamura et al. [33]

3

-

6

7

1,2,4,5,8

-

3

Medium

CAS

        

Leenders et al. [16]

1,2,3

5

6

4,7

8

-

7

High

Parratte & Argenson [40]

1,2,3

5

6

4,7

8

-

7

High

Kalteis et al. [15]

1,3

5

6

4,7

8

2

6

High

Kalteis et al. [38]

1,3

5

6

7

8

2,4

5

Medium

Sugano et al. [41]

3

5

6

4,7

1,2,8

-

5

Medium

Najarian et al. [39]

3

5

6

7

1,2,8

4

4

Medium

Wixson & MacDonald [18]

3

5

6

7

1,2,8

4

4

Medium

  1. * Methodological quality criteria are presented in Table 1.