|
Fulfilled validity criteria
|
Unfulfilled validity criteria
|
Incomplete information for validity assessment
|
Internal validity score
|
Methodological quality
|
---|
Study
|
Selection bias (1,2,3)
|
Performance bias (5)
|
Attrition bias (6,8)
|
Detection bias (4,7)
| | | | |
---|
MIS
| | | | | | | | |
Lawlor et al. [31]
|
1,2,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
-
|
7
|
High
|
Chimento et al. [4]
|
1,2,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
-
|
7
|
High
|
Ogonda et al. [34]
|
1,2,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
-
|
7
|
High
|
Kim [30]
|
1,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
2,8
|
-
|
6
|
High
|
Bennett et al. [22]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
1,2
|
5
|
Medium
|
Chung et al. [23]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
1,2,8
|
-
|
5
|
Medium
|
Khan et al. [29]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
1,2,8
|
-
|
5
|
Medium
|
Dorr et al. [26]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
1,2
|
5
|
Medium
|
Ciminiello et al. [24]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,4,8
|
-
|
4
|
Medium
|
Dutka et al. [27]
|
3
|
-
|
6
|
4,7
|
1,2,8
|
5
|
4
|
Medium
|
Hart et al. [28]
|
3
|
-
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
1,2,5
|
4
|
Medium
|
Mazoochian et al. [37]
|
3
|
5
|
-
|
4,7
|
8
|
1,2,6
|
4
|
Medium
|
Rittmeister & Peters [35]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,4,8
|
-
|
4
|
Medium
|
Speranza et al. [36]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
4,8
|
1,2
|
4
|
Medium
|
DiGioia et al. [17]
|
3
|
5
|
-
|
4,7
|
1,2,8
|
6
|
4
|
Medium
|
De Beer et al. [25]
|
3
|
-
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,4,8
|
5
|
3
|
Medium
|
Levine et al. [32]
|
3
|
-
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,4,5,8
|
-
|
3
|
Medium
|
Nakamura et al. [33]
|
3
|
-
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,4,5,8
|
-
|
3
|
Medium
|
CAS
| | | | | | | | |
Leenders et al. [16]
|
1,2,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
-
|
7
|
High
|
Parratte & Argenson [40]
|
1,2,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
-
|
7
|
High
|
Kalteis et al. [15]
|
1,3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
8
|
2
|
6
|
High
|
Kalteis et al. [38]
|
1,3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
2,4
|
5
|
Medium
|
Sugano et al. [41]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
4,7
|
1,2,8
|
-
|
5
|
Medium
|
Najarian et al. [39]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,8
|
4
|
4
|
Medium
|
Wixson & MacDonald [18]
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
1,2,8
|
4
|
4
|
Medium
|
- * Methodological quality criteria are presented in Table 1.