Skip to main content

Table 1 Methodological quality criteria list

From: Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature

Item Description
1 Was the method of randomization adequate?
2 Was the treatment allocation concealed?
3 Were the groups similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators?
4 Was the outcome assessor blinded to the intervention?
5 Were co-interventions avoided or similar?
6 Was the drop-out rate described and acceptable?
7 Was the timing of the outcome assessment similar in all groups?
8 Did the analysis include an intention-to-treat analysis?