Skip to main content

Table 1 Methodological quality criteria list

From: Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature

Item

Description

1

Was the method of randomization adequate?

2

Was the treatment allocation concealed?

3

Were the groups similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators?

4

Was the outcome assessor blinded to the intervention?

5

Were co-interventions avoided or similar?

6

Was the drop-out rate described and acceptable?

7

Was the timing of the outcome assessment similar in all groups?

8

Did the analysis include an intention-to-treat analysis?