Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuanyuan Wang
20 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Katz
21 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lars Victor von Engelhardt
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Katz
18 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuanyuan Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lars Victor von Engelhardt
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
14 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lars Victor von Engelhardt
Resubmission - Version 7
14 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-75

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement