Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mitchell Haas
12 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kris Anderson
19 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maruti Ram Gudavalli
25 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Lewis
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mitchell Haas
4 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Lewis
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Lewis
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Lewis
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
1 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-39

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement