Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
26 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Dominik Irnich
Resubmission - Version 2
26 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Cummings
20 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Audette
3 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Dominik Irnich
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Cummings
28 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dominik Irnich
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dominik Irnich
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-32

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement