Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Anterolateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy versus standard medial approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: does it matter?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Michael Hirschmann
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Alcerro
4 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bjorn Burian
22 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Hirschmann
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Hirschmann
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
22 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-167

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement