Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate analysis of existence of pain versus no pain after the procedure

From: Are joint and soft tissue injections painful? Results of a national French cross-sectional study of procedural pain in rheumatological practice

Explanatory variables

OR *

95% CI

P-value**

Patient perception of the procedure assessed by the physician

  

< 0.0001

Very/Quite badly R

1

  

Quite well

0.271

[0.085 - 0.865] (S)

 

Very well

0.013

[0.004 - 0.041] (S)

 

Pain intensity related to underlying pathology in the previous week

   

Absent R

1

 

< 0.0001

Mild

1.348

[0.780 - 2.330] (NS)

 

Moderate

1.780

[1.039 - 3.051] (S)

 

Severe

2.024

[1.165 - 3.513] (S)

 

Underlying pathology

  

0.0006

Acute R

1

  

Chronic

1.725

[1.099 - 2.708] (S)

 

Inflammatory rheumatological disorder

2.521

[1.474 - 4.310] (S)

 

Joint osteoarthritis

2.302

[1.548 - 3.423] (S)

 

Flare-up over degenerative pathology

1.972

[1.301 - 2.988] (S)

 

Post-traumatic

2.967

[1.483 - 5.935] (S)

 

Back pain

1.755

[1.077 - 2.861] (S)

 

Radiculalgia

1.394

[0.856 - 2.272] (NS)

 

Tunnel syndrome

1.975

[1.148 - 3.399] (S)

 

Tendonitis

1.310

[0.876 - 1.960] (NS)

 

Bursitis

1.241

[0.716 - 2.151] (NS)

 

Cristal arthropathy

1.883

[0.772 - 4.595] (NS)

 

Sex

   

Male R

1

 

0.0557

Female

1.141

[0.998 - 1.304] (NS)

 

Site of procedure

   

Knee R

1

 

0.0889

Spine

1.160

[0.854 - 1.576] (NS)

 

Shoulder

1.174

[0.901 - 1.530] (NS)

 

Small joints

1.551

[1.137 - 2.118] (S)

 

Others

1.212

[0.903 - 1.627] (NS)

 
  1. Multivariate analysis was carried out with variables selected from univariate analysis that demonstrated a significant threshold of 20%.
  2. Multivariate analysis was performed on 7518/8446 patients. 928 observations were not included due to missing data.
  3. *OR: Odds-Ratio
  4. CI: Confident Interval
  5. ** Chi2 test significance
  6. S: significant CI
  7. NS: non significant
  8. R: Reference.